|
Sevenstringster on October 11, 2008 at 2:00 am
Well agreed...And that's stock. But I cannot deny I would never pay 70k for an 05 nsx when I could just buy an M3 for around the same price.
sebastianprelude11 on September 18, 2008 at 10:09 pm
piękne auto :-)
MarkMonteagudo on September 14, 2008 at 10:15 pm
Get the '91 NSX! It'll probably be under $25k, but in crappy condition. So I don't know.
Daaaemonslayer on September 6, 2008 at 7:44 pm
woww!one day i gonna get one of those!till then i drive my MR2 :-P
MattMK45 on August 13, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Well I don't know how much late 90's are but in the UK they're super rare these days. I've only ever seen one!
TheBMW8Zone on July 28, 2008 at 7:50 am
I'm sure it is better than your car. The Acura NSX does a quarter mile in 12.4 seconds with only 297 horsepower. Also NSX owners get over 300,000 miles on it. And you say it's bad? You are either stupid or jealous.
TheBMW8Zone on July 28, 2008 at 7:48 am
Acura NSX does a quarter mile in 12.4 seconds with only 297 horsepower. Also NSX owners get over 300,000 miles on it.
TheBMW8Zone on July 28, 2008 at 7:47 am
Id say no more than 70,000$. I just watched 101 cars you must drive and he said about 80,000$ or even more than what they cost brand new. It was a investment. But I'd think i reasonable price would be under 70,000$. One on Barett Jackson sold for 42,000$ or something like that.
Slool on July 20, 2008 at 2:36 am
Man, Senna was a beast, great car!
kewlmangad00d on July 14, 2008 at 11:12 pm
this is the ugliest piece of shit ive ever seen. id take a shit on this 4 horsepower abomination but i'd feel too sorry for my turd lolz |